Your COVID-19 Internet problems might be COVID-19 Wi-Fi problems

orbi, plume, eero
Enlarge / Left to right: a looming Netgear Orbi satellite, an upside-down Plume superpod, and an older Eero model.

Jim Salter

The Great Telework Experiment of 2020 has brought a lot of network challenges to the fore. Obviously some jobs are better suited to remote work than others, and some companies were better prepared to shift in that direction. However, successful telework isn’t just about the company infrastructure—it’s about employees’ home setups, too.

Most of the folks needing to work from home also need to work from Wi-Fi. And Wi-Fi, unfortunately, doesn’t scale very well: the more people and devices you cram onto it, the slower and balkier it gets. There are two ways you can alleviate this problem: you can plug your device directly into the router (or a connected switch) with an Ethernet cable, or you can improve your Wi-Fi itself.

Buying a new router is unlikely to substantially improve your Wi-Fi—but if you’ve got a single router now, upgrading to mesh almost certainly will.

“It’s worse when my roommate is home.”

Last week, an architect confided in me that while the shift to remote work had gone much better for her company than for most of the firms they deal with, they did still have one person coming into the office to work. His home Internet connection just wasn’t that great. She added that although he used to be able to work from home, things weren’t so great now that his roommate was home all day, too.

The bit about the roommate really got my attention. This was a strong sign that her employee’s Internet connection wasn’t likely to be the problem at all—it was much more likely to be his Wi-Fi. I asked a few more questions, and she volunteered that the router was in his roommate’s room. So, yes—we’re talking about Wi-Fi, and we’re talking about a shared situation.

You rarely see problems with multiple people sharing an Internet connection, so long as everything’s wired—small businesses very frequently share less bandwidth than a single residential connection offers, among ten or more employees, without any complaints. The secret is that businesses—smart ones, at least—have cabled connections to everyone’s computer.

When you have two computers with wired Ethernet connections to a router, both computers can talk at once. Each connection is full duplex—meaning the computer can send packets to the router at the same time the router is sending packets to it—so big downloads don’t have much of a latency impact on small uploads.

Beyond that, the switch—which connects all the wired connections together and may be built into the router itself—manages all these connections intelligently. This allows the router to get input from each device in a timely fashion, as well as split its own time fairly to deliver requested data to each of those devices.

Wi-Fi is different: it’s half duplex, and it’s a single collision domain for everyone connected. If your roommate’s laptop is sending an email, you can’t get the next packet of your Netflix stream until her laptop’s done talking—and, similarly, her laptop couldn’t begin to send the email until it spotted a break in between your downloading Netflix packets.

Remote work is a lot like online gaming

Simple streaming—watching Netflix or YouTube—is, oddly enough, one of the least demanding tasks you can give your Wi-Fi. The traffic is almost entirely download, and it’s not latency-sensitive—if Netflix wants to build up a ten-minute buffer, you’ll never know about it; a blip in service will get smoothed out without a single visibly dropped frame.

Unfortunately, while delivering a video stream isn’t all that challenging, living on the same network with a video stream can be. If the bandwidth consumed by the stream is close to the bandwidth limit of the Wi-Fi connection (not the internet connection!) there won’t be many “breaks” in the stream for your own device to get a word in edgewise.

The key vocabulary word here is airtime. If the majority of the available airtime is already being consumed, a device that has a latency-sensitive communications need—like remote-controlling an office computer—is going to have a bad time.

The spotty airtime availability for your device to upload a request—whether it be a simple HTTPS request to fetch a webpage, or mouse or keyboard inputs delivered to a remote-controlled PC at the office—means things get laggy. You’re not having a throughput problem, you’re having a latency problem—you move your mouse and click on something, and it takes half a second (or more!) before anything happens.

Congratulations, you’re an honorary gamer now—and you have the same complaints they do. You’ve got the dreaded “lag,” and it’s breaking your workflow.

A single bad connection is everybody’s problem

Let’s go back to our earlier example of a Netflix stream. If one roommate is watching a 4K show on Netflix, that show will eat up—on average—about 25Mbps. In a house with a 100Mbps cable Internet connection, that doesn’t seem so bad.

But the same situation can start looking a lot more grim inside the house or apartment itself, when looking at the Wi-Fi. If the router and the streaming device are in the same room, and they’re connected on 5GHz, that 25Mbps stream is probably only consuming 15 percent of the airtime. But if they’re two rooms apart from one another, the same stream is likely consuming 75-90 percent of the airtime.

Although 2.4GHz connections can carry farther, they’re slower to begin with. They also have even worse congestion problems—that same higher range and penetration means you’re more likely to have your own devices competing with your neighbors’ for airtime on the same frequency. (No, it doesn’t matter if you have different passwords—airtime is airtime, period.)

This is when you start having serious latency issues—with the majority of the Wi-Fi airtime already occupied, there are significant delays between when you tell your own phone or laptop you want to request data, and your phone or laptop can relay that request to the router.

The first step is eliminating as many Wi-Fi connections as you can. If your Roku or smart TV is sitting right next to the router—plug it in! Now you don’t have to worry about that 25Mbps 4K video stream clogging up your Wi-Fi, and the laptop that does need to be on the Wi-Fi will have a better time of it.

Decreasing airtime consumption with Wi-Fi mesh

Note: some RF engineers recommend -65dBM as the lowest signal level for maximum performance.
Enlarge / Note: some RF engineers recommend -65dBM as the lowest signal level for maximum performance.

Jim Salter

For the devices you can’t plug in, the next step is increasing their connection quality—again, not just one device’s connection quality, all devices’ connection quality. Mesh Wi-Fi can help significantly here by cutting down the distance and obstructions needed for each connection.

To get the highest connection quality—which means the highest modulation rate, the lowest error rate, and the least airtime used per MiB of data—you need nearby access points. In the graph above, we can see generic RF loss curves at 2.4GHz and 5GHz. Anything above -67dBM should be a solid connection—which means for the 5GHz connections you want, you need to be no more than a room and a wall away.

If you have devices farther from the nearest access point than that, they will have to negotiate a lower QAM rate and tolerate higher error and rebroadcast rates. A device that’s 15 feet and a single wall away from the router may be able to move 200Mbps of data, where the same device at 20 feet and two walls is lucky to move 30Mbps.

Where mesh can help here is by shortening the links between devices. Even in the worst-case scenario—where the mesh kit must re-broadcast data on the same channel it receives it—this can end up conserving airtime significantly. And in many cases, the mesh kit can do better than that by communicating with your device and its upstream node on two separate channels simultaneously.

Let’s return to the example in which a device is 20 feet and two walls away from a router. This is a pretty iffy connection—perhaps a speed test shows the device receiving 30Mbps of data. Remember, the speed test consumes all available airtime—so while this device should be able to consume a 25Mbps video stream, in doing so, it will have consumed roughly 85 percent of the available airtime.

What if we replace the router with a mesh Wi-Fi kit? Now our device communicates to a mesh node 10 feet and one wall away, and that node communicates with the router node, another 10 feet and one wall away. Even in the worst case—in which all traffic both upstream and down must go over the same channel—we’ve increased our available airtime significantly.

Since each link of our mesh Wi-Fi connection—the one from your device to the first node, and then from that node to the next—is close by and high quality, they’ll be capable of 200Mbps or more apiece. So although we’ve doubled the total amount of data in flight—our 30Mbps became 60Mbps, since it has to be transmitted twice—it’s now only consuming 30 percent of the airtime, instead of 85 percent.

Which mesh kit should you get?

The market is packed full to bursting with Wi-Fi mesh kits—and most of them are at least somewhat better than a standalone router, in nearly any situation. But in our opinion, there are three major standouts.

All of the three kits below—Amazon Eero’s three-piece, a set of four Plume Superpods, and Netgear’s three-piece Orbi RBK-53—covered the absolute crap out of our 3,500-square-foot test house and did so with a very active multiple device network running. Each has its advantages and disadvantages, which we’ll cover below—but we think the Eero is the best value for most people.

Amazon Eero three-piece kit

The kit we recommend comes with three of these Eero nodes. Fruit not included.

The kit we recommend comes with three of these Eero nodes. Fruit not included.


We’re not going to beat around the bush here—if you’re on the fence about what to get, pick up a three-piece Amazon Eero kit and be done with it. Eero has always been one of the better mesh options, but the performance-per-dollar shot through the roof when Amazon acquired them and redesigned the hardware.

Before the Amazon acquisition, Eero offered two device types—Eero Pro, which was a desktop-style tri-band design, and Eero Beacon, a plug-in, dual-band satellite with a built-in nightlight. Both of these models are still available, but they’re a bit too expensive for what they do.

Amazon’s redesigned Eero hardware skips the third radio in the Eero Pro and skips the nightlight and plug-in design of the Beacon. What’s left is a small unobtrusive and inexpensive node with two wired Ethernet jacks and two radios. You can use the wired Ethernet jacks to plug in nearby TVs, Chromecasts, or similar devices—or to take advantage of wired backhaul, if you’ve got it available.

You can also place the desktop-style chassis above head height, for example atop a tall bookshelf. This helps clear bulky furniture—and human bodies!—from the connection line of sight, further improving Wi-Fi connection quality.

In this 1080P torture test, four laptops are each watching a simulated 1080P video stream—while also trying to do simple Web browsing. The bigger the bar, the worse the experience.
Enlarge / In this 1080P torture test, four laptops are each watching a simulated 1080P video stream—while also trying to do simple Web browsing. The bigger the bar, the worse the experience.

Jim Salter

Normally, we’re all about three-radio designs—which both Orbi and Plume’s Superpods offer—but Eero’s firmware does an excellent job managing the two radios it has, and the price point is impossible to argue with. In our earlier testing, Eero wasn’t quite as high performance as Plume’s more expensive Superpods—but it beat the living tar out of Google’s new Nest Wi-Fi; and Nest itself did better than a standalone router would have.

You can currently get a three-piece Eero kit for only $200—and Amazon will throw in an Echo Dot for free.

Plume Superpods

Plume's Superpods are high-performance and extremely unobtrusive.

Plume’s Superpods are high-performance and extremely unobtrusive.


If you’re itching to get the absolute highest-performance Wi-Fi mesh kit available, there’s really only one choice: Plume’s Superpods. The Superpod design features three radios in each small, hexagonal unit—and not just any radios, either. Specifically, the secondary 5GHz radio is a Qualcomm Atheros QCA9984.

This matters because the QCA9984 is an absolute cannon of a radio, well suited for backhaul connections from one Superpod to the next. It does better at longer ranges than most mobile devices can, and it has four parallel MIMO streams, which enable individual Superpods to communicate with one another at extremely high speeds. We clocked Superpods moving real-world data between one another at more than 750Mbps in a 3,500 square foot, multi-story house.

Since these are tri-band designs, a Superpod can communicate with a phone or laptop on one 5GHz radio while backhauling to the next Superpod on the QCA9984. And since the QCA9984 is several times faster than a typical client device, even having several Superpods with active connected devices doesn’t tend to diminish throughput—or increase latency.

A four-piece kit of Superpods, ordered directly from Plume, will set you back $350—but you’ll also need to pay a $50 annual subscription fee. This does have some upsides—Plume’s support techs are network engineers with access to incredible telemetry about what problems you might be having and why. You also get a lifetime warranty—including comparable hardware upgrades as designs change—for as long as you keep your subscription current.

Plume tells us that their customers are fine with subscriptions, and we believe them. We also know that the majority of Ars readers aren’t so happy about the idea—but if maximum performance is what you’re looking for, this is the kit for you.

Plume’s subscription price isn’t dependent on the number of units, so we’d recommend erring on the side of more Superpods with less distance between them, rather than trying to get away with as few as possible.

Netgear Orbi RBK-53

There are many Orbi three-piece kits—we specifically recommend the RBK53, not the cheaper RBK43, RBK33, or RBK23.
Enlarge / There are many Orbi three-piece kits—we specifically recommend the RBK53, not the cheaper RBK43, RBK33, or RBK23.


The first thing we need to mention about Netgear Orbi is that there are a lot of different Orbi designs—and we’re not really that fond of most of them. So when we say the Orbi RBK-53, we very specifically mean you need to check the model number!

You can find less expensive and similar-looking kits with model numbers like RBK-23 or RBK-43, but they don’t have the same hardware design on the inside. These less expensive Orbi kits may still be better than a single router, but we don’t like them nearly as much as the equally inexpensive Amazon Eero three-piece kit we gave top billing.

The RBK-53 kit consists of one router and two satellite nodes, all shaped rather like strange, upright alien vases. Each piece has the exact same chipset we mentioned in the section on Plume Superpods, above—an IPQ4019 dual-band system on chip, with an additional QCA9984 5GHz radio.

For those of you who didn’t and don’t want to read the Superpod section, that additional QCA9984 is where the magic comes in—it’s incredibly high-speed and long-ranged compared to your mobile devices, and it operates on a different 5GHz channel than the IPQ4019’s 5GHz radio. This allows an Orbi to “talk” to both your laptop or phone and the next Orbi node upstream at the same time.

In our testing, Orbi doesn’t quite hit the same high performance levels that Plume’s Superpods do—and it costs a little more, at $400 for the set of three. But there’s no subscription requirement—and no cloud dependency, either.

Almost every mesh Wi-Fi kit on the planet—including both Eero and Plume—can only be managed from smartphone or tablet apps and require an Internet connection to function properly. Netgear Orbi does not—the kit can be managed from a simple Web GUI like any standard router would be, with no cloud stuff necessary.

If you have a smaller place, you might consider an Orbi RBK-50 kit instead—it has the same hardware but only two pieces to the RBK-53’s three. We suspect that most environments would benefit more from an Eero three-piece than an Orbi two-piece, though—and the Eero kit costs less.

Where to put your new mesh access points

The remaining question for new mesh users can seem overwhelming: where do you put all the pieces? The short version is simple: try to arrange your access points evenly throughout the house, so that all of your devices are within one room and one wall from the nearest access point.

Beyond that, try to put the access points above head height if possible—we like the top of tall bookshelves for this. Keeping the APs high means that there are fewer obstructions—like bulky furniture or human bodies—in between the AP and its connected devices, which in turn significantly improves connection quality and reliability.

You can frequently get away with a little—and we do mean a little—more distance between the APs themselves, since they don’t move around, have a steady power source, and are manufacturer-tuned specifically to work well with one another. If in doubt, err on the side of longer distances between APs and shorter distances between client devices and APs.

This is plenty of advice for most people—but if you want to get the absolute most out of your Wi-Fi, and understand more about both how and why, check our February 2020 in-depth feature.

This Article was first published onSource link . We are just re-posting and re-sharing from their RSS feed.

Top Tech Stories

About Mary Jane

Check Also

How to Effectively Advertise your Business using Two Proven Methods

Logo Maker by SmallSEOTools

Amazing Logo Maker by SmallSEOTools